[Lillemy71]

Opprinnelig lagt inn av Borealis, her.

Når jeg googler vedkommende lege, har han ganske mange "riper i lakken"...men teorien er han vel ikke alene om, så jeg er spent på om nårtid etablert medisin må innrømme villedende helseråd......

Fan du ut hvorfor han ha riper i lakken? Nettopp for det at han har hevdet dette i mange år, det er ikke i tråd med hva "mainstream" leger i USA mener og ikke minst den farmasøytiske industrien mener. Og hvis du tror det du leser på QW (om du har lest det), trekk bort minst halvparten og ta resten med en halv kilo salt, da kommer du kanskje i nærheten av sannheten.

Sitat:

If you'd dig a little deeper about the license revocation, you'd find that he retired in 2003 and was not practicing medicine. In 2009, the Arizona Medical Board went after him in retirement because of his books and speeches about inflammation causing heart disease and his outspoken stance against statins. They looked at 8 years of patients prior to 2003. Even though he had one of the highest success rates of cardiothoracic surgeons in Arizona, they callously revoked the license of a retired surgeon. As if that wasn't enough, they issued a Press Release announcing it. He was the only surgeon whose license was revoked to have a Press Release issued about it. The intent and message was very clear. Don't speak out against pharmaceutical companies or conventional medicine if you want to keep your license.